JOHN WAYNE, KIRK DOUGLAS AND DICK CAVETT: THE MUD, THE BAD AND THE SMUGLY

Television and the media in general interpret the world for the masses. The problems are not just with who gets to do the interpreting and with the dishonesty of the interpretation, but also with the dishonest personae of the people most viewers - even sceptical ones with regard to interpretation - buy into as genuine. To give you an example of what I mean, I'll give a little commentary on the clip below from the Dick Cavett Show. As you will see later, it is very relevant to contemorary events. In a mirror of contemporary life, John Wayne is absent from the studio, just as he is now long deceased in real life, while Cavett and Kirk Douglas live on, Douglas currently at the ripe old age of 102. Douglas and Wayne both had their names changed in order to play the heroic masculine characters with whom they became synonymous, Wayne, born Marion Morrison, probably because his name was too effeminate (although he himself had no part in the decision), and Douglas, born Issur Demsky, because it was too foreign.

 

 

In the clip above, Cavett foregrounds his Leftist politics in which he embraces the cult of the Other, in this case taking the side of the Amerindians over that of the people of his own ethnicity in his mention of John Wayne's interview with Playboy Magazine shortly prior to this broadcast in 1971. We know full well that the so-called "Native Americans" are not native to America at all, but crossed the Bering land bridge from Asia around 20,000 years ago. The first European settlers attempted to create dwellings in uninhabited areas and were immediately attacked by Indians, just as the Vikings had been attacked some 600 years prior upon landing an exploratory expedition in what is now modern-day Newfoundland, as is recounted in The Saga of Erik the Red. Therefore what John Wayne said in his interview for Playboy Magazine was correct from a Eurocentric perspective. What Cavett expects us to do is take the opposing perspective, one borne of his own self-hatred and externalised to his own group. 

 

What is also dishonest in Cavett's propaganda is the way he himself racialises the whole historical narrative, where differences in European peoples are obviated, as are the wars in and over the New World between the British, French and Spanish, as are the wars between tribes of Amerindians, in favour of a disingenuous Red Skin versus White Skin ahistorical lie. This lie is then sold to the spectator via the group approval of the studio audience cretins, who are told when to clap, laugh and smirk by stewards holding up prompts or the instructions on the television screens staring back at them. Again though, this ahistorical lie is either borne of Cavett's self-hatred as a White Man or the shekels he receives from his studio masters, which help to ease his conscience. Perhaps it is a bit of both.

 

Then there is the double standard. If we are to take Cavett's moral critique as an honest and objective one, why does he neglect to mention the Jews' more recent takeover of land and their deliberate ethnic cleansing of the prior population to the Jew Kirk Douglas? The Six-Day War in which Israel annexed the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights, the West Bank and the Sinai Peninsula, took place only four years prior to the interview, and at the time of the interview, the Jews were busy creating settlements in the first three territories and expelling the Arabs. Perhaps, if we are being generous, we can dismiss it as mere cowardice on Cavett's part, as Wayne is not sitting opposite him, whereas Douglas is. If we were to be more cynical, the question of shekels might arise again. Interestingly, just a couple of weeks ago, on 25th March, Donald Trump became the first world leader to officially recognise the Golan Heights as Israeli territory on behalf of the United States of America.

 

The Playboy interview with John Wayne strangely resurfaced a few weeks ago, which all major news outlets suddenly latched onto. It was odd that it happened without any real reason and suggests that it was orchestrated, particularly as Wayne's comments are rather well known. It suggests that the establishment propaganda machine were just looking for another story to portray Whites as mindless bigots and ramp up the political pressure on Whites, and this has led to a campaign to rename John Wayne Airport, which had in any case originally been called Orange County Airport. Certainly, the news outlets were very selective in the quotations they used, which were of course taken out of context and made as inflammatory as possible in accordance with anti-White politics. 

 

 

 

Yet coming back to my original point about the double deception in the media, John Wayne openly declared himself a white supremacist in the Playboy article. Yet how could that be when he was married to a Hispanic Peruvian in Pilar Pallete at the time? Indeed, he had already been married to a Hispanic in Alicia Saenz before that, and so certainly had a taste for non-Whites. If he truly believed his own race was superior, why would he marry into and have children with races he considered inferior? Was it the same cognitive disonance that led Aimé Césaire to "proclaim his negritude" while married to a white Frenchwoman? Or was it all, like the tough guys he played, just an act? Perhaps the man who gave the Playboy interview was indeed John Wayne - a fiction created by studio executives - but the man who married Pilar Pallete was Marion Morrison.

 

It is also interesting that the video clip above was released onto Youtube by the Dick Cavett Show channel just a week ago on 4th April, which cohencides nicely with the fabricated furore over White Nationalism. Indeed, is that not the real reason the actor known as John Wayne is now on repeat showing? And is it not strange that it directly succeeded the shooting in Christchurch by Brenton Tarrant and preceded the 9th April US House Committee on "Hate Crimes and the Rise of White Nationalism", which is a further stepping stone to abolishing human rights for ethnic Europeans. All White Nationalism is is an attempt to reaffirm our human rights as an ethnic group in response to the constant oppression and potential genocide White Europeans are facing worldwide. Many politicians and academics now speak of genocide as a positive quite openly. No one really knows who Brenton Tarrant was. He is alleged to be a white supremacist, yet had visited Israel, and mosque leader Achmed Bhamji claimed that the shooting was the work of Mossad, although just mentioning this is, apparently, anti-Semitic.

 

This brings us to the other side of the timing of all this. As stated earlier, Donald Trump became the first world leader to officially recognise the Golan Heights as Israeli territory on behalf of the United States of America on 25th March, just ten days after the shooting, while all eyes were on the "evils" of White Nationalism, in effect legitimating Jewish supremacism. This came as Benjamin Netanyahu, who has just been re-elected to a fifth term as President of Israel, addressed AIPAC and met with Trump and as the push grows in America to criminalise any criticism of Jews, following a resolution passed earlier in March condemning "anti-Semitism". Still tired of winning yet? Isn't it time to cast off these actors and phony heroes and look towards the hero within?