THOUGHT FOR THE DAY LXVIII: HUMZA YOUSAF AND THE LGBT ISLAM PARADOX

In this video, we examine the seeming contradiction between Humza Yousaf's Leftist politics and his fundamentalist religion. We then expand on this theme to examine why Muslims overwhelmingly vote for the Left in the form of the Labour Party in spite of its un-Islamic policies.

A MUFFIT OF MEMES

It's memes time again, and these are the latest bundle that have been floating around on Gab and on our Faceberg page. We kick off with the globalist elite's mad power grab in the wake of Coronachan, stroll through the faux blaxploitation crowd, heckle the police and perverts and pervert police, and finish off with a little pop at "anti-establishment" establishment artist Banksy. Hope you enjoy and please spread the love around by sharing on social media. This blog and its attendant Faceberg page and Youtube channels is one of the most censored and shadow-banned sites around, so our only means of dissemination is by the work of activists sharing our stuff. Thanks to all who do so.

A RIPOSTE TO JAMES O'MEARA AND OTHERS ON THE TRANNY/HOMO QUESTION

As some readers of this blog will know, my article on the current battle between transsexuals and feminists has been reposted on the Counter Currents website with my consent. I do not approve of all who write on there, but equally, there are also very good articles published. My articles appear on many websites across the net, but this does not necessarily mean that I endorse the website in question. Certainly, some websites have copied my articles without asking for consent first. Onto the point: there was a flurry of comments to the article, some of which were of a very dubious nature for one reason or another. As people have no doubt realised, I moderate comments quite strictly on here. People are more than welcome to debate with me and I will happily concede points in light of better information, but I expect references so that information given can be verified. I do not usually engage in the comments sections underneath my articles on other websites that publish them, but the comments left to the article I have mentioned are so egregious I feel I have to address some of them. This brings me nicely onto the first dubious commenter:

 

CALIFORNIA DREAMIN' (OF CATCHING AIDS)

Last month saw California decriminalise knowingly infecting another person with HIV. It is, in effect, now legal there to give another person a death sentence through sexual intercourse. The two chief proponents of the bill were Scott Wiener and Todd Gloria, both of whom are open homosexuals and Democrat politicians. The former is also Jewish and the latter a confused jumble of several different races, including Alaskan Indian tribes, Philippino, Dutch and Puerto-Rican. One notes the higher tendencies towards homosexuality of people from such ethnic backgrounds. Weiner's purported reasoning was that:

 

Legislators passed a number of laws three decades ago, at the height of the HIV epidemic, that criminalized behaviours of people living with HIV or added HIV-related penalties to existing crimes. These laws were based on fear and on the limited medical understanding of the time. In the decades since, societal and medical understanding of HIV has greatly improved. Effective treatments dramatically lengthen and improve the quality of life for people living with HIV — treatments that also nearly eliminate the possibility of transmission. HIV is a public health issue, not a criminal issue. These felonies, which treat HIV differently than all other serious communicable diseases, stigmatize people living with HIV and discourage people from getting tested and into treatment.

 

 

ANNE MARIE WATERS AND CONTROLLED OPPOSITION

Anne Maries Waters has appeared from nowhere to become the latest darling of those who do not wish to see the Islamification of Great Britain. I am always suspicious whenever the latest 'saviour' shows up - and I am right to be. Waters is currently founding her own party, 'For Britain', after losing the UKIP leadership contest, and spoke at the Traditional Britain Group meeting yesterday. She was very careful in her speech to concentrate on what she was against, but was very guarded about what she was for. There are very good reasons for that, for her vision for Britain is anything but traditional.

 

GENDER PRONOUNS AND PASSIVE-AGGRESSIVE HOBBYISM

The latest cult to emerge from the nihilistic Left is that of 'gender pronouns', which also seem to change every so often. Ten years ago, it was not even on the radar; then suddenly, every American university campus was flooded with things like 'ze' and 'xe' and 'per' and 'thon' and various others. Now, the latest pronoun fashion seems to be to use 'they' and 'them' for usually obese middle-class Leftists who wish to reject Natural Order and the way they were born, as though changing language somehow changes the reality of who they are.