The
environment is something nationalists seem reluctant to talk about, which is
disappointing given the subject’s hijacking by the Left. Perhaps it is because
of the image of baggy-clothed unwashed people hugging trees that comes into
people’s minds or perhaps it is down to the fact that too much Christian
thinking has dominated nationalism for far too long. It is probably both. My thinking,
of course, is Pagan, and therefore the condition of the countryside of these Isles
has special significance to me. I wish therefore to present a comprehensive
environmental policy for the British Democratic Party and other nationalist
groups to consider. I do, of course, not expect the BDP to turn to Paganism;
indeed I would rather they leave the subject of religion alone.
1.
1. Reforestation
Firstly,
there is nothing wrong with hugging trees, without which we all die. The
desecration and destruction of our forests started with the Industrial
Revolution, when many of our ancient woodlands were thrown into the fires of
steam-fuelled industry without thought of replenishment. This even gets a
mention at the beginning of the Tory writer Sir Walter Scott’s Ivanhoe
(1819). Over two hundred years have passed since then without thought for the
consequences of this defilement. The air quality has diminished because
England’s lungs have been ripped out: the great Greenwood that once stretched
from South Yorkshire to Leicestershire.
The
ULEZ tax is yet another government scam to rob the working man, and has no
impact on air quality. The Labour Party also seek to continue the vandalism of
what’s left of the countryside with the acquiescence of the ironically named
Green Party, as they plan to build 1.5 million new homes to house the third
world in Britain. The immigration policies of all the establishment parties
(including Reform) represent an environmental disaster for Britain. The air is
becoming thick with the fumes released by the excess populations of countries
who have wantonly destroyed their own ecosystems.
Mass
remigration will both relieve the highways and byways, reducing air pollution,
but it will also leave many buildings unused, meaning the most unsightly and dilapidated
can be demolished to unpave the way for parks and woodlands. This will further
improve the air quality and reduce carbon dioxide (which we are told is bad and
therefore should make the climate change mob happy). Properly maintained
forests also provide cheap and renewable fuel for heating, building materials
and homes for wildlife, as well as skilled and meaningful jobs.
2. 2. Refertilisation
The
land has been cheated for a century and more due to industrial farming methods.
Sadly, we have a cosmopolitan, metropolitan political caste in charge who know
more about hummus than they know about humus. This must change. The Earl of
Portsmouth (then Viscount Lymington) warned of the danger of using artificial
fertiliser 90 years ago; it is scant replacement for dead red blood cells and
vegetable matter. Although his suggestion of repurposing human faecal matter
for fertiliser has since been implemented, it is not enough because of other
problems. The soil now lacks its former fecundity because of the lack of dead
insects and faecal matter degrading into the soil. The lack of dead insects is
down to the use of chemical pesticides, which we will look at in more depth
later. This has disrupted the whole food chain and decimated wildlife, hence
also a lack of faecal matter.
Dog
excrement, which is currently bagged up and thrown out to landfill, can also be
repurposed as fertiliser. Instead of faeces being bagged up, disposable gloves
can be provided in parks with a separate bin for pure dog excrement. The average
dog produces 275lbs of excrement per year. At a low estimate of 13 million dogs
in the UK, that is 1.6 million tons (which is only slightly more in metric
tonnes) of faeces that can be converted into fertiliser.
The
soil can also be revitalised via the cultivation of nitrogen-rich crops, but
will need to be supplemented by animal waste. Therefore, rather than reducing
the amount of cattle, which is fraudulently proposed by the Bill Gateses of
this world, we ought to increase their number. Eating more fresh meat, which is
both filling and nutritious, instead of junk food will also reduce obesity and
improve general health.
3.
3. Humane
Husbandry
We
all rightly despise Halal and Kosher ritual slaughter for its barbaric cruelty,
yet too often ignore the inhumane conditions associated with factory or battery
farming. All of it must be outlawed. Animals must be allowed a decent and
comfortable life and a swift and dignified death. There is not just a moral
imperative to do this, but practical ones: sickly animals produce poor meat.
Grassy orchards with grazing livestock is the way forward, for animal dung also
replenishes the soil, as we have noted.
4. 4. Organic
Farming
If
this all seems like organic farming, it is because it is. All farming ought to
be organic farming. GMOs must be forbidden until adequate studies have been
conducted on the long-term health and environmental impacts such crops have.
Let us be clear: organic farming does not mean farming without machines. The
tractor, the combine harvester and the milking machine are all indispensable
labour-saving devices; but there are certain practices that need to be
dispensed with, even outlawed.
The
greatest of these evils is the use of pesticides. Pesticides are another reason
for long-term health problems such as respiratory illnesses, neurological
diseases, cancers, infertility and reproductive disfunction, and hormonal
problems. Pesticides remain in the air after crop spraying and their residue is
found in the food we eat.
There
are other more natural pesticides, the chief of these being birds. Over the
last five decades the farmland bird population of Britain has fallen by over
60%. I have noticed it. When I was a boy, the sky was alive with flocks of
birds. They are now conspicuous by their absence. Birds deal with weed seeds
and caterpillar infestations, while ladybirds and other beetles are excellent
at combatting greenfly, whitefly and blackfly. There are also plant-based
sprays that are now widely available for these and other pests. Of course,
natural pesticides are not quite as effective as unnatural ones. But as more
produce will be grown on the increased farmland created by mass remigration, it
will offset the higher percentage of crops lost to pests.
5.
5. Reduction
of Plastic Packaging
The
political caste and supermarket directors tell us we must pay for plastic bags
because they are bad for the environment, yet meat bought off the shelves and
at the deli is all packaged in plastic! And since when has paying more for a
practice stopped the practice itself? As mentioned above, the ULEZ is not
designed to reduce pollution, but to reduce the wealth of the working man.
Similarly so with the plastic bag scam.
While
plastic packaging is necessary for certain things, the practice of packaging
fresh foodstuffs and drinks needs stopping, for the countryside is littered
with non-biodegradable detritus. Equally, people are consuming ever more
microplastics that clog the arteries, and the University of California
concluded in a study that exposure to microplastics is suspected to harm
reproductive, digestive and respiratory health, and suggested a link to colon
and lung cancer.
The
fact is that much plastic packaging is an evil that can easily be dispensed
with. The growth of forests means we can go back to wrapping fresh foodstuffs
in paper. We can even go back to fish and chips in old newspapers! Bottles can
return to glass, as they once were, which is recyclable. Unfortunately, in this
day and age, the political caste has instituted criminal negligence,
recklessness and irresponsibility, and spot fines would have to be imposed on
people deliberately breaking glass bottles in public areas.
The
waste from necessary plastics can also be repurposed harmlessly instead of
being shovelled into landfills, or worse still thrown into hedgerows. Wall insulation
is one solution that is gaining ground. A nationalist government would issue
grants to companies engaged in research and development for plastic waste
repurposing or else create its own organism dedicated to it.
6.
6. The
Seas and Waterways
The
seas are in an appalling condition thanks to industrial pollution and
overfishing. Pollution can easily be stopped via heavy fines on companies
fouling the waters (that goes for the rivers etc. too), as well as legal
prosecutions of directors and forced closures if necessary. In the 1990s,
before the coming of Blair, and thanks largely to the petitions of and licence
and permit fees paid by anglers, we had the cleanest waterways in Europe. This can
be so again.
Rivers
must be regularly dredged as they once were to prevent flooding. The current thought
is that dredging does not reduce flooding, and even creates flooding, but this
is patent nonsense. The reason dredging no longer works is that it is no longer
done consistently the full length of a river, which creates bottlenecks and irregular
water flows.
Equally
unhelpful is the fact that flood plains have been built on. Natural marshes and
wetlands have disappeared along with their attendant wildlife. Mass remigration
will again be the force that will recreate the space necessary for the
re-establishment of our flood plains and ecosystems.
Fish
stocks can easily be replenished via the creation of fisheries along Britain’s
coasts, which will create jobs for those left unemployed by the decline of the
fishing industry. Equally, the use of micromesh nets and bottom-towed trawling
gear must be permanently prohibited in ALL British seas for the ecosystem to
recover and thrive.
The
British seas are also an underdeveloped source of energy. We can rid ourselves
of the unsightly, dangerous and inefficient wind turbines by replacing them
with undersea tidal stream generators to harness the power of the North
Atlantic Drift. A wind turbine has an average energy output of 6GWh per year,
whereas the latest generation of shrouded tidal turbines create up to 12GWh.
7.
7. The
Cost
It
is true that the cost of this change will be enormous. Farming will have to be
subsidised to a much greater degree than it is now to compensate for the
expense of organic production. More people will be needed to work the land, and
more training for the tasks that go along with it. The tasks are indeed of a
great (dare we use the word in its proper context?) diversity, which makes the
job interesting and fulfilling. The countryman is a herdsman, a husbandman, a
mechanic, a mason, a carpenter, a machine operator, a caretaker and an
odd-jobs-man. Compensation will also have to be given for the lower yields
associated with organic farming.
Yet
the cost of not doing this is still greater. It is the cost associated with ill
health. Cancers and respiratory illnesses are on the rise, and little wonder;
yet the political caste—for who can doubt that they are now become a caste unto
themselves—have little interest in grabbing the nettle by the root. They are
too happy to throw money to their friends on the directorships of
pharmaceutical corporations to develop experimental drugs, and throw away more
money on the NHS, where it is squandered on an ever-expanding army of
bureaucrats and managers instead of medical staff.
As
any fool knows, prevention is better than cure, and to use two old sayings in
one sentence, this prevention lies in the aphorism that you are what you eat. A
diet that is higher in nutrition and free from pesticide residue will result in
healthier people with more energy and vitality. I am not saying anything new
here; the Earl of Portsmouth’s seminal work Famine in England addressed
this very subject back in 1938. Children in particular will grow into healthier
adults with better nutrition and be able to fight off common diseases and
viruses without visits to the doctor or hospital. This will alleviate the
strain on the NHS.
Adults
too will benefit in many ways, not least in increased fertility. We are
informed that European fertility rates are the lowest ever, with sperm counts
particularly affected. The political caste seem to be particularly pleased in
telling us this, particularly as it provides them with one of their many falsehoods
for the need for immigration, a falsehood made apparent by their disinterest in
addressing the root problem.
Savings
will also be made by our agricultural self-sufficiency. The country will no
longer be beholden to countries on whom we are dependent for food importation.
Indeed, such will be the quality and reputation of our produce, particularly
with regard to livestock, that it will be desired by more affluent people and
restaurants abroad—although I hasten to add that transcontinental
transportation of live animals would be forbidden, and carcasses would instead
by transported in refrigerated lorries.
The
cost would also be compensated by the production of clean energy instead of
reliance on foreign companies like EDF, who extort the British consumer even
more than the French. Monies generated, such as the £1.9 billion the EDF makes
in Britain every year, will therefore serve the British economy and no one else’s.
Savings will also be made in the reduction of flooding. Direct costs related to
flooding reach £2.4 billion per year, rising to £6.1 billion when disruption to
businesses and the economy is factored in.
The
cost of personnel needed will be offset by the dismissal of civil servants employed
in fake and redundant jobs. The money spent on race relations, diversity and
inclusion, LGBTPJQ+ etc. will also be redirected into a coherent seas
commission, waterways commission and forestry commission, with DEFRA being
replaced by a pastoral commission tasked with helping farmers and cottage
industries, and with preserving British country life.
Conclusion
In
short, the Great Britain of the nationalist future will be a country that both
embraces the latest technology—indeed pioneers it—and lives in harmony with
Nature. Technologies will be developed that work to serve the British ecosystem
and the British people simultaneously, the two going hand in glove in any case.
Being at the forefront of research and development will prevent further brain
drains, like the one under Margaret Thatcher in the early 1980s. Our greatest
minds will be put to use in making Great Britain a truly green and pleasant
land.
As I am writing this, all the major French cities are being destroyed by the political Left. Some commenters have said that it is immigrants (including second, third, fourth and fifth generation immigrants) or that it is youths, which one can often take as a euphemism for immigrants in any case, but the riots, violent organised mobs and demonstrations outside schools have been organised by groups affiliated to Jean-Luc Mélanchon’s party La France insoumise (LFi).
In 2011, as the party of which I was a member fell apart amidst the
scandal and corruption centred around the party chairman Nick Griffin
and the man he had brought in to “look after” donations Jim Dowson, a
letter came through my letterbox. It looked awfully like one of the
British National Party begging letters that had become such a nuisance
since Jim Dowson’s appointment as Griftmaster General of the party of
which he was not even a member. Indeed, he was rather vocal at that time
about not even being a nationalist, and regularly went around comments
sections calling us Nazis and telling us to turn to Jesus. For Mr Dowson
is a Xtian fundamentalist.
Dear Indians,
A little over a hundred years ago, my
great-grandfather and one of his brothers were officers in the British
Indian Army. The two of them did not care much for your land, in fact
they hated it so much that their father, my great-great-grandfather had
to buy them out of the army, much to his chagrin and embarrassment. I
myself would never care to visit India. It is, according to an old
friend of mine, a director of a company who had to visit its factory in
India one week a month, a country held back by the abject stupidity of
its people. He described to me how, whenever a machine broke down,
everyone on the shop floor suddenly stopped what they were doing and
gathered around the machine to stare at it.
Since the publication of Rupert Lowe’s rape gang enquiry report the
other day, there has been much speculation as to where he obtained the
figure of 250,000 victims and if this number is realistic. This
questioning, particularly with the emphasis on an attempt to debunk this
figure and thereby dismiss the whole report as a fabrication, has
largely come from the extreme left and non-White men largely of Asian
and Muslim background. This ought to come as no surprise, as left wing
extremists and Muslim terrorists have now become strange bedfellows. Two
of the most vocal have been the current leader of the Green Party Zack
Polanski, a homosexual Jew, and former Scottish First Minister Humza
Yousaf, a Muslim anti-White racist who introduced laws to curtail the
free speech of indigenous Scots.
The murder of Henry Nowak has been revelatory in many ways. It is sad
that it has taken the death of an innocent young man with his entire
life ahead of him to expose to the masses what nationalists have known
for years. Firstly, there is the police. That the police handcuffed a
dying Ethnic European victim and took the side of a Sikh Indian who
cried “Racist!” is as horrific as it is predictable by nationalists. We
have seen this sort of treatment meted out to nationalists for over 20
years. At the British National Party stalls back when I was campaigning
up until 2011, the police were open about their orders: any trouble and
we were the ones to be arrested. This encouraged the enemies of Britain
to act violently with impunity. Now it is the case that the enemies of
Britain are encouraged by the government and its bully boys the police
to act violently against the Ethnic British regardless of political
affiliation. Lord Summerisle did nothing wrong.
.jpg)
.png)
