GRENFELL BONFIRE NIGHT

The level to which Britain has become a communist totalitarian police state has been seen today in the wake of Bonfire Night celebrations. For those reading not from England who do not know its significance, Bonfire Night in England is a mixture of several things. Like other bonfire celebrations across Europe, it's roots lie in Paganism, in both the religious significance of Samhain and the preparation for the coming winter. The word bonfire comes from bone fire, for it was originally made to burn as a ritual sacrifice the bones of animals that had been slaughtered for salting. The celebration was then Christianised as Samhain gave way to All Saints and All Souls Days. The event then took on an added significance after the failed attempt by English Roman Catholics to blow up the Houses of Parliament on 5th November 1605 while King James I was at the opening of the House of Lords, after James had failed to stop the persecution of Catholics because of the increasing influence of Puritans. Never let Christians con you into believing that Christianity united Europe.

 

 

 

The leader of the plot was a certain Robert Catesby, but the man caught and tortured for three days into revealing the names of his co-conspirators was Guy Fawkes. Since then, it has been traditional to put an effigy of Guy Fawkes, made usually of straw and old clothing and called a Guy, on top of the bonfire. The Guy over the past 40 or so years has also often taken the form a particularly hated politician. In the 1980s, Margaret Thatcher was a popular figure to burn, particularly by mining communities, and in the 1990s-2000s, Tony Blair. Yesterday, a group of people decided to burn a mock-up of Grenfell Tower, the real one having burnt down last year. Upon the video being released on social media, the police, who no longer have the resources nor inclination to attend to Black knife crime or Muslim rape gangs, swooped into action, sensing that someone from either of the two aforementioned communities could have their sensibilities offended by these obvious White far-Right extremist terrorists. These evil-doers have since handed themselves in to a South London police station.

 

Black humour has always been a mark of the British sensibility.  Evelyn Waugh had it; Monty Python had it; Spike Milligan had it in spades. We have often used it as a coping mechanism in dark times. Yet in theses dark times, we are no longer allowed it....at least when it comes to some things and certain people. Non-White comedians denigrating Whites through humour will get a spot on the BBC's Live at the Apollo; the reverse will get you at least a fine and possibly a prison sentence. This is the crux of the matter. The people who died in the Grenfell Tower fire were overwhelmingly non-White and the jokers White. Theresa May herself made her displeasure known in all the tones of a communist dictator, which shows just how serious this threat to ideology is. More interesting was the statement given by one of the survivors, Rukayet Mamadu (a good old British name), who called the video the "climax of intolerance of the system and society", almost as though Leon Trotsky had handed her a sheet to read off.

 

There have been inquests, investigations and theories into the causes of the towering inferno, with everyone shifting the blame. Oddly, however, the tenants themselves have never come under scrutiny in official and media reports. Yet one story that filtered out from a former maintenance worker on the tower was that he routinely had to attend to what can only be described as "third-world problems". Basically, some of the tenants from Africa and Asia had no idea about how modern appliances worked and regularly caused minor floods and fires with showers and cookers. The fire was apparently started by a faulty fridge-freezer and was enable by flammable cladding, but one has to wonder how a fridge-freezer managed to catch fire in the first place. Of course, if we is not allowed to talk about the incident, even in jest, we can never know. The government simply do not want us questioning their narratives, because we might start wondering why it was now in the age of such strength in diversity that a building that had stood for 50 years was burnt to the ground. We might question why the building was chock full of les damnés de la terre and why they were brought here. We might question whether we needed these anti-White laws because these people have been brought in or if we needed these people to bring in the anti-White laws.