THE "RIVERS OF BLOOD" SPEECH, by Enoch Powell

As Black Lives Matter terrorists murder, rape and loot their way across our homelands, now is perhaps the right time to air a certain speech (below) by the greatest prime minister Great Britain never had, John Enoch Powell. The Left constantly claim that those of us on the Right are unintelligent and uncultured, when the reverse is generally true: one only has to look at the wanton destruction of our statues at the moment. Couple that with the current state of the arts and it becomes all too obvious. Enoch Powell was a man who bestrode politics and culture, a man who spoke at least seven modern languages, a man who could write in Ancient Greek and Latin to the point where he could imitate Classical philosophers, a man who became a university professor at the age of 25, a man who composed poetry in his spare time, a man who staked his political career on warning the native British of the evils corrupt politicians were inflicting upon them. The speech delivered to the General Meeting of the West Midlands Area Conservative Political Centre is extraordinary in its prescience, especially in how those corrupt politicians would use the ethnic minorities to sow division and wreak havoc on the native population. To his dying day, Powell refused to apologise for speaking the truth and maintained his moral position towards racial difference and the wickedness of immigration. We should follow his example.

BLACK FRIDAY AND SAMUEL SMITH'S

According to early reports, Yesterday's Black Friday broke all sales figures records, up 14.5% on last year. A festival that started in the USA, coming as it does the day after Thanksgiving, it is now consuming Europe. And that is indeed the nature of the beast: consumption. It is perhaps the first festival that was founded on the religion of consumerism. Such a quasi-religious festival had to have been born in the Anglosphere, where capitalism is bound to the Reformation and the ensuing Puritan tradition that gave birth to economic and social liberalism. Was it not that theologian beloved of the American descendants of Scotsmen and Northern Englishmen, John Calvin who said, 'Greed is good, greed works'? Something like that anyway. I'm glad we got shut of them after the Restoration. Anyway, Black Friday is now being exported. Even in the usually anti-capitalist France, Black Friday has been promoted relentlessly this year. The French term for this is 'vendredi fou', although it tends to be kept in English in line with the European Union's attempt to reduce all European languages to dialects of English, although the Wikipedia site claims this is translated as 'vendredi noir', showing again how that site is written by spergy but dim sixth formers.

 

 

 

RUGBY WORLD CUP 2019

I wasn't going to bother writing about the Rugby World Cup, but as someone over at Counter Currents has covered it without addressing the real issue, I thought I'd chip in with a short article. As someone who actually played the sport back in the 1990s, I feel I'm a little more qualified than many to comment on how the game has been transformed. When I first started playing at adult level, the whole of rugby union was amateur, ruthlessly so. Anyone who had been paid to play professional rugby league was not permitted to play union and a declaration had to be signed. Most at the rugby club I played for openly displayed their disdain for homosexuals and persons of colour. This was the norm and rightly so. Fast forward a mere twenty years and these normal and natural attitudes have been stamped out - at least superficially. But Nature will always seek to reassert herself and such attitudes will become the norm again as soon as the establishment propaganda machine and means of legal coercion are removed. Equally, national attitudes have also changed, which brings me back to the World Cup.

 

 

 

ANTHONY JOSHUA VS ANDY RUIZ: THE POLITICS BEHIND THE FIGHT

Last Saturday's headline heavyweight boxing event at Madison Square saw a huge upset. The press have exaggerated its magnitude, but it was certainly a bigger upset than Lewis vs McCall, perhaps as big as Lewis vs Rahman on paper (but which was expected by those who realised Lewis had undertrained), but not as big as Tyson vs Douglas. Nonetheless, Anthony Joshua's loss to squat, fat Hispanic Andy Ruiz will go down as one of the great shock results of heavyweight boxing. After Ruiz got up from a solid uppercut square on the chin in round three, Joshua found himself suddenly tasting the canvas and was on the back foot from there on in, being put down with ease several times before the referee waved it off in the seventh round. Joshua half-heartedly protested that he was fit to continue, but the vacant look in his eyes, of a man who didn't quite know where he was, who had lost any ability to defend himself and who had already spat out his gumshield in resignation, told a different story. As a White European, I watched this bout as a neutral, but the politics behind the fight were as interesting as the match itself and certainly more relevant in a sport that has always been heavily politicised.

 

 

 

WHAT THE H&M DEBACLE SAYS ABOUT RACE

This will be a relatively short article, but it raises some important philosophical questions for those who believe in the false dogma of either race blindness or race as a social contruct. Both deny the physical nature of race as a reality. A few days ago, the clothing retail chain H&M released the advert below featuring a black child wearing one of their hoodies that bore the inscription 'Coolest monkey in the jungle'. This has now resulted in Blacks in South Africa organising and mobilising against H&M stores, which have been trashed and looted. The Blacks, as ever, claim their actions are justified because H&M are 'racist' because of the word monkey being in close proximity to the black child. The question as to quite why a company that wants their custom would wish to insult them has not occurred to them, nor has the fact that their reaction resembles the behaviour of lower primates, but these points rather disguise the main issue regarding the whole notion of 'racist' insults of this nature.

 

TRANSGENDERISM, TRANSABLISM AND THE NIHILISM OF THE LEFT

The latest cult of Leftism is transgenderism. As per usual, the Left have sent infiltrators into the Right in an attempt to normalise obviously abnormal behaviour. One notes the Youtuber transvestite Blaire White mouthing moderately conservative views while normalising the idea of him using the ladies toilet. The main point of Blaire White though is that, in seeing him debate against the LGBTJQ+ community and their plethora of 'gender non-binary' pronouns, we accept him as one of our own. And in that moment of acceptance, we have already normalised all of the LGBTJQ+ position bar the trimmings.

REALITY CALLS FOR THE ALT RIGHT, OR THE CANCER OF EURASIANISM

As most Alt Righters will already know, 'Reality Calls' is the alias of Tara McCarthy, who is, as she herself stated in one of her Youtube videos, is majority White, but also partly of Indian, partly of Jewish extraction. The Indian admixture is known to be at 25%, the Jewish admixture unknown. Tara is very open about her Indian heritage (although she now downplays the percentage), less so about her Jewish forebears, and the video in which she discusses her Jewishness has been taken down. Given the rhetoric about Jews in the Alt Right, this is hardly surprising. Whatever her non-White origins, Tara poses a problem for the Alt Right, because she wants to be included - indeed, affirms her inclusion herself - and there are those who wish to include her. There are those, however, who do not, and I number myself among these and wish to explain why to those who have more latterly joined the movement and still carry with them the cancer of liberalism.

WHY RACIAL EXTREMISM IS GOOD

The nihilistic Left and their ethnically Other helpers (particularly in the Jewish community) have pushed ever further towards the extermination of White Europeans. One hears it openly in the university lecture theatres the length and breadth of the Occidental World now, and, perversely, anyone so much as arguing against this attempt at genocide is labelled an extremist. It follows that it is therefore good to be an extremist, but why is it good? Well, for pure races this is obvious (their eventual extermination), and we looked at why miscegenation was bad for half-castes (their crises of identity) in the article 'Why IQ in Different Races is Irrelevant'. But the Leftist counter-argument is that they wish to abolish identity in any case, so once everyone is the same through mixing, there will be no problems. No identity for all ergo no crises of identity. Is this true and also what is the Left, that which is sinister, not telling us?