Showing posts with label James O'Meara. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James O'Meara. Show all posts

Sunday, 2 February 2020

YUKIO MISHIMA, FASCISM AND THE ALT RIGHT

I read Andrew Joyce's article on Yukio Mishima at The Occidental Observer after a friend recommended it, and now I see that someone called Riki Rei has written a riposte over at Counter Currents. Riki Rei does not sound like the most European of names to me, and one is left to wonder yet again about how committed the author of The White Nationalist Manifesto Greg Johnson is to White Nationalism. After all, why the need to defend a non-White East-Asian homosexual? The question is largely rhetorical, of course. The question for Alt Right Mishima-weeaboos is whether it is his racial otherness or his dubious sexuality that is the biggest attraction. There are indeed over twenty articles at Counter Currents dedicated to a man of dubious character who was not even of European ancestry. The famous pose of Mishima as 'the penetrated saint' St Sebastian popular with homosexuals from Oscar Wilde onwards says a lot about the man and his followers. I do not need to iterate further on Mishima, for Joyce's article very much sums up my own thoughts on the Japanese actor, but what Joyce has written regarding Mishima also brings Joyce's own politics into question.

 

 

 

Saturday, 3 November 2018

A RIPOSTE TO JAMES O'MEARA AND OTHERS ON THE TRANNY/HOMO QUESTION

As some readers of this blog will know, my article on the current battle between transsexuals and feminists has been reposted on the Counter Currents website with my consent. I do not approve of all who write on there, but equally, there are also very good articles published. My articles appear on many websites across the net, but this does not necessarily mean that I endorse the website in question. Certainly, some websites have copied my articles without asking for consent first. Onto the point: there was a flurry of comments to the article, some of which were of a very dubious nature for one reason or another. As people have no doubt realised, I moderate comments quite strictly on here. People are more than welcome to debate with me and I will happily concede points in light of better information, but I expect references so that information given can be verified. I do not usually engage in the comments sections underneath my articles on other websites that publish them, but the comments left to the article I have mentioned are so egregious I feel I have to address some of them. This brings me nicely onto the first dubious commenter: