DON'T GO FULL RETARD ON THE JQ!

There are in fact many ways one can go full retard on the JQ. One way is to invite Jews into the movement by associating with them, which allows them the possibility of ingratiating themselves with you. Pretty soon, they may be writing articles on your Alt Right website or making podcasts for the 'goyim'. A while later, they might try introducing some subversive elements into the mix, all done ironically, of course, and in the best of humour. Indeed, the humour will be such that when good nationalists speak out against having Jews in the movement, others will accuse them of 'counter-signalling' and 'purity spiralling', when what they really mean is 'muh entertainment'. The Gods forbid anyone should stand in the way of their entertainment with reasonable concerns.

 

Yes, I know they are.

Another way you can go full retard on the JQ is the Jack Renshaw way. Jack has been charged with a racial hatecrime for the speeches he gave at a rally in Blackpool and at the Yorkshire Forum last year in which he addressed the JQ. I also spoke at that Yorkshire Forum event and Jack's speech followed mine. It was without doubt the most cretinous, most idiotic, most retarded piece of oration I have ever heard. As is widely known, both because of moles within nationalist circles and Jack's own boasting, and now also because the police appear to have received a copy of the speech, Jack called for the extermination of the Jews. At the end of the speech, he was pilloried by the audience assembled, including by me and by the two members of the National Front I had brought from Hull. We left straight after the speech because of time constraints, and so we had very little time to debate with him. Nick Walsh quite rightly just called him an idiot. 

 

I have since speculated as to whether he is a plant sent to discredit our movement, but lean towards him being just a silly young boy egged on by his peers and by people who are trying to discredit the movement. Certainly though, I do not appreciate him having mentioned me personally in his speech, which I mused may have been a ploy to implicate me in all this nonsense by association, particularly as I had spoken about the poet Ted Hughes' relationship to Jewry in my speech. The Left has, after all, been attacking me and Mjolnir Magazine for some time now. Jack and his peers have criticised me for having mentioned the word 'plant'. Yet there are plants in the movement and moles at the London and Yorkshire Forums. In fact, I deliberately fed one disinformation about me that has since turned up in Hope Not Hate and Searchlight articles. 

 

 

 

But let us assume he is just simple minded, as I suspect, and examine why what he said is retarded. Firstly, there is the issue of Jack's impending court case brought by the Crown Prosecution Service. We can argue all day about the wrongs of the Orwellian hatespeech laws, but it makes no difference. Those are the existing laws and breaking them will result in prosecution. As James Lewthwaite once said, though, as long as we are reasonable, the authorities would be reluctant to come for the Rightist intelligentsia because we can defend ourselves intellectually and our imprisonment would give greater impetus to our cause, as it would be seen as unjust by an increasingly aware public. What Jack has done, though, is to say something deliberately that the general public will find morally repugnant. Far from seeing the case against Jack as unjust, the case can and will be used by the state to normalise the laws against the freedom of speech and expression we have in Britain.

Not only this, but the case may be used to shut down the London and Yorkshire Forums and their other spin-offs, which would rob the movement of a platform for our ideas. The day after the event, I wrote this e-mail to the main organiser of the London Forum, Jez Turner:

Subject: Re: How well do we know L***** D*****?

Hi Jez,

I'm more concerned about Renshaw himself. If the London Forum puts his speech up on Youtube, these things will happen:

1) the boy will be sent to prison for no less than two years (assuming he's not some commie agitator)

2) the London Forum channel will be erased from Youtube

3) the state will shut the London Forum down and possibly prosecute its members

4) the incident will be used to demonise the movement for years to come.

What I also don't like is that he mentioned me in his speech at the beginning. I want nothing to do with this individual. Mjolnir is drawing good creative and intelligent people to it and thus into the movement. I don't want some idiot spoiling it. These "Hitler was right" types have no sense of reality - or of history - and think that Joe Public is suddenly going to start embracing the Führer and revolt against their masters. The problem is they spend all their time in little cliques and on the internet and then believe everyone is like them deep down.

I am not concerned by L***** D*****, even if she turns out to be a BBC reporter. I have done or said nothing I am ashamed of. Renshaw plays straight into our enemies' hands though and little wonder the speech drew attention given the content.

Best,

Dave

You see, even if Jack Renshaw puffs himself up with bravado about not being bothered about going to jail, and even if I think he is retarded, I would like to see him escape a prison sentence if possible and I tried to get his speech supressed both for his own good and for the good of the movement as a whole. Prison will not be a pleasant place for Whites who are known racialists, given the demographics there. Jack and his ilk have stated that people who do not go around in public screaming the most retarded stereotyped slogans that the Left so love to report are cowards and only appear on the internet. This is complete horseshit and done to try to coerce the simple-minded into joining in the buffoonery. I for one have happily spoken in public on many occasions and stood on Rotherham market for the BNP with Marlene Guest and John Sheldon back in the day.

 

Yet Jack is a symptom of a wider problem in the movement, and that is a sort of autistic focusing on a single antagonistic group, as though with the removal of that group, the whole world would hold hands and sing songs together. For some it is the Jews, for others the Muslims, still others Negroes, and so on. And here I believe young Jack has been led astray by older heads who ought to know better, but who, like their Leftist counterparts, have never grown up - people who in middle age and beyond still fantasise about the Third Reich of their imagination. While I do not subscribe to the official narrative concerning the Third Reich and the Jews, the fact remains that that regime had determined upon an expansionist war in the East, beyond the 1914 boundaries, in order to turn White European ethnostates into German colonies, a war that would cost millions of lives of the best of European men.

But let us return to the Jewish Question. Let us look at Jack's proposition itself. How would you exterminate the Jews exactly? No matter the morality, Israel is a militarily powerful state with nuclear capabilities. Do you really think Israel would stand by and watch Jewry in the West be systematically exterminated? And this again shows the nonsense of the Hitler-worshippers and Friends of Palestine in the movement when they say they wish to see Israel erased from the map. A two-state solution is the most logical one, but logic has little bearing on that region and, in any case, the whole issue is a distraction from what we should really be focusing on, which is not what our antagonists are doing, but what we are not doing, namely creating the conditions for our future survival and prosperity.

Granted Jewry has been eager to see and oversee our downfall as a race, but this is no different to any other outsider group, for the law of Nature demands one assures the dominance of one's own group. So what does one do with the Jews? The simple answer is they have a place to go: Israel. And that is why Israel is actually needed. Individuals who have attempted to ensure our genocide must be punished as individuals, just as those individuals of our own people would be. Yet one cannot put all the world's woes on Jewry. Do not forget that only a few centuries ago, they lived in ghettoes and were forbidden power. So who let them out and why? Answer that question and you might get somewhere. Like the rest of this article, that might not be a popular assertion, but reality is never popular and I'm not here to win popularity contests.