AGAINST BREXIT: AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE

People in the nationalist movement often make the grave mistake of being for something by dint of the fact that their enemies are against it and vice-versa. Following suit from the extreme Left, many youthful members of the Radical Right know what they are against before they know what they are for. It has therefore always been the position of Mjolnir Magazine and its spin-offs to concentrate more on what we represent than on deconstructing our opponents' positions. Brexit is a case in point. Most nationalists saw the Brexit vote as a means to jab our genocidal opponents in the European Union in the eye. I was far more cautious; indeed I said then, as I do now, that Brexit will make absolutely no difference to our concerns: mass immigration, state oppression, the overthrow of our law and morality, the rape of women and children by third-world aliens, the state-enforced genocide of Whites, media and academic brainwashing of the masses.

 

 

The problem is that Whitehall is filled with exactly the same kind of politicians and civil servants as those of Brussels and Strasbourg. Even if Britain's politicians are separated from those on the continent, they will continue the European Union's policies regardless and independently. And even if UKIP were to win a General Election (although that is a very remote possibility), they would continue importing people and peoples from all over the world. There might be more from the middle class and fewer from the underclass, but that would be about all. Nigel Farage has said as much many times. This is because all these parties and politicians and civil servants see things in the same terms; Britain is merely a club that anyone can join. Sometimes the rules of conduct are a little stricter than at other times, but money always talks and anyone can buy their way in. Worse though, it is a club that the management wish to tear down brick by brick to make way for something else. They are not quite sure what exactly, but they are absolutely positive that it will be better, especially once the sort of members who built the place are gone.

 

There are perhaps still positives though. It will be more difficult for companies to recruit directly from Eastern Europe, which will hopefully help the beleaguered White British working class to find work, get accommodation and start families. At the moment, companies like Symphony Kitchens in Yorkshire recruit directly from recruitmant agencies in Poland, and as the employees are paid by the agency, the British minimum wage is avoided. This means Polish labour is preferable to British labour, especially as the manufacturing, distribution, catering etc. companies that employ them are often in cahoots with letting agents who pack their properties with labourers and take their rent directly from their wages. The East Europeans often sleep as they work, in shift patterns, so that more can be slept in one property. Thus, cheap accommodation also becomes incredibly difficult for the native British to obtain, especially as these deals are all done away from the public eye.

 

The EU will also be left bereft of the money Britain pays into it, which constitutes 13.45% if the EU's budget - a whopping €18.2 billion in 2015. That is about €50 million per day. Britain is the third-biggest contributor behind Germany and France and the deficit will be difficult for the EU to replace, which will mean it will not have the finances to expand further eastward, where Muslim countries like Turkey and Azerbaijan have been pencilled in for future inclusion, the Council of Europe administrating in both those countries as a precursor to full inclusion. Is Azerbaijan even geographically in Europe? It will also mean the EU will struggle to afford economic bailouts for failing European member states like Greece and Portugal, which may mean those states leave in order to take control of and stabilise their own economies.

 

Such are the benefits of Brexit from our standpoint both at home and abroad, but what may well happen after Brexit, and has been advocated by Farage, is that Britain forges closer ties with the Commonwealth and replaces White East European immigration to provide cheap labour for the bourgeoisie with non-White immigration from overpopulated countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nigeria. The Commonwealth contains two billion non-Whites, the majority of whom live in poverty and would relish the opportunity to come to Britain. These potential immigrants, who have also been proven to have a much higher rate of criminality, would also pose a genetic threat to our European identity, especially in an era when miscegenation is heavily propagandised by a genocidal elite. 

 

 

The other problem with Brexit is that British nationalists may well be separated from their brethren on the continent. There are precious few racial nationalists around these days who are open about their views in Britain and I believe their isolation from countries further east where such views are ever more mainstream would prove detrimental to the cause. The more the public at large hears racialist views espoused in an intelligent and articulate manner, the more they will be seen as what they are: normative and natural. Equally, what of the relationships between Whites of different countries? I am friends with an Anglo-Swedish couple who will find things difficult and I know of many more such instances, where couples have found love through their shared commitment to the nationalist cause - and when I talk of nationalism, I talk of nationhood in its proper racial meaning.

 

I understand more than most that integration of any kind is destructive to indigenous culture, but sadly we are in a position where we may have to choose the least destructive. I believe that one way or another, this will be an era of great change. It will therefore be imperative that the change is an acceptable one. Culture evolves in any case, and where would Newton have been without those giant Greek shoulders? Where Carlyle without Goethe? Where Goethe himself without Shakespeare? And where Shakespeare without Seneca? There has always been a certain amount of movement within Europe: the Ancient Britons to Armorica now Brittany, the Huguenots to Britain and Germany, the Danes to the whole coastlines of Northern Europe and so on. Some movements changed the local cultures more than others, but cultures remained quintessentially European. Contrast that with the Turkish, Moorish and Arabic incursions in Southern Europe over the centuries.

 

At this very moment, the present Prime Minister Theresa May is attempting to reverse the Brexit decision. I believe she will come up with a Brexit deal that will be so potentially disastrous to the country and unfavourable to its people that ever more people will demand a second referendum on Brexit. She will essentially deliberately sabotage Brexit so that governmental decisions can continue to be deferred to faceless bureaucrats far away. No one wants responsibility, for it is far easier to blame some faceless bureaucrat for the country's situation. And I believe the referendum will be reversed. I think this would actually be the best outcome for nationalists, for the reasons I have outlined above and because it would prove for once and for all that the government is not merely undemocratic, but anti-democratic. It would legitimate any means to bring it down whenever opportunity arose.