AN OPEN LETTER TO THE INDIANS IN BRITAIN

 

 

Dear Indians,

 

A little over a hundred years ago, my great-grandfather and one of his brothers were officers in the British Indian Army. The two of them did not care much for your land, in fact they hated it so much that their father, my great-great-grandfather had to buy them out of the army, much to his chagrin and embarrassment. I myself would never care to visit India. It is, according to an old friend of mine, a director of a company who had to visit its factory in India one week a month, a country held back by the abject stupidity of its people. He described to me how, whenever a machine broke down, everyone on the shop floor suddenly stopped what they were doing and gathered around the machine to stare at it.

 

The average Indian in Britain likes to boast of his food to the Natives. “Without us,” he suggests, “British cuisine would be bland and tasteless.” According to my friend, the cuisine in India is barely edible - meat especially so. He was effectively a vegetarian for one week a month, and suffered bouts of dysentery. Like my great-grandfather, he also hated going there. We remember, indeed, that the so-called Indian food in Britain is in fact not wholly Indian food, but Anglo-Indian food, for it was created during the British Raj for the British palate, and bears little similarity to what the vast majority of Indians themselves eat. It is also prepared using European equipment and European standards of hygiene.

 

Indeed, going back to the British Raj, hygiene is one of the things we British sought to improve. Contrary to the narrative of the average chip-on-the-shoulder Indian in Britain, we actually wasted vast fortunes on trying to improve the lot of the average Indian in India. This is why, in what you now call Mumbai and was once Bombay, you are still using the still-functioning sewerage system that we created over a hundred years ago. At least some of you are, because the system was built for Bombay’s then population of two million, whereas modern-day Mumbai’s is between six and eleven times that, depending on what is counted as the city itself, and you have not sought to expand nor improve upon this great feat of engineering.

 

To say that this has resulted in Indians defecating in the street would only be partially true, like all good lies. You have to admit that the average Indian is also quite partial to defecating in the street. This is evidenced by the fact that it has become such a phenomenon in Britain, where we have working public toilets at your disposal. I have seen many Indians talking about British men urinating in our streets, but this does not compare. These are of course exceptions, such as of drunken behaviour, or of people being caught short, but it is generally done discretely, and is irregular behaviour, not the norm. Equally, the fact that you Indians equate defecating and urinating in the street shows your lack of understanding of the difference in terms of waste residue, of cleanliness, of sanitation, of basic hygiene and of the spread of disease.

 

The other matter is, of course, that they are our streets. The fact that you defecate on them shows a complete disrespect for the kindness we have shown you. It is telling that in the statement on X by “British Indians Voice”, he infers that it is you Indians who have graced us with your presence, that it is in fact you who have been a boon to us, and that we should show gratitude for the bounty that is yourselves. I reproduce the statement below for posterity, for it is the view of countless Indians living in Britain, and I shall reply to this as indeed the voice of Indians living in Britain.

 

 

 

Firstly, let me say that the sheer arrogance of the statement betrays the spirit in which it is intended. You accuse the Ethnic British of being the problem. How are we the problem in our own homeland? Do you envisage a final solution to this problem? I ask because we seem to serve no purpose, and you suggest that Britain would be better without us, indeed that it would be better populated with Indians. The Great Replacement is not conspiracy theory, but conspiracy fact. You state that you have always stood here. That is patently absurd. The fact you describe yourselves as “British Indians” reveals the lie. Britain is not located in the Indies. I have no hyphenated identity; I am simply British.

 

The claims you make about us in relation to yourselves is ridiculous: yes we have football hooligans, but to ignore your behaviour at the cricket shows a complete lack of self-awareness. You talk of stealing jobs: the company I mentioned earlier employs Indian men in India; when an Indian opens a factory in Britain, he fills it with Indians. There is no competition; the Indian engages in tribalism and cries “racism” if we practice the same. The fact that you are doing it in our country as well as your own shows your level of honesty when it comes to competition. Why would I, indeed, invite your teeming millions to come and compete against my children in any case? You talk of your benefits to us. Your competition brings no benefit.

 

Let us talk about your other alleged benefits. You seem to believe you are propping up our NHS. I grant you I had a very good Indian doctor when I was a child, as well as one from Ceylon. These were of the old sort, educated in the days of the British Empire. And this again exposes the misguided conceit of the present-day Indian, that he believes he achieved any Indian excellence in medicine without European intervention, invention and innovation. Now, of course, you Indians have flooded our universities, and as they practice racial discrimination against the native population, we cannot get access to the jobs you claim we need you for. We do not need you. We need to get rid of you so that we can have access to our own education system again. Your argument is that of the cuckoo in our nest.

 

Then there is the question of hygiene in hospitals under your auspices. Yes, the subject of hygiene again. It is increasingly likely that the English nurse Lucy Letby is rotting in prison to cover up the Indian Dr Ravi Jayaram’s lack of basic hygiene awareness and competence. The general public is very aware of how far hygiene standards have fallen in the NHS, but have been reluctant to address why. Until now. Dr Jayaram also played the race card to get Lucy prosecuted, lest we forget, thus conveniently getting himself off the hook. The conditions in his wards were disgraceful, regardless of Lucy’s innocence or guilt.

 

Then we have the systemic sexual abuse of patients by doctors from the Subcontinent. Krishna Singh, Chirag Patel, Amal Bose, Vijay Gaikwad, Manish Shah are just some of the more recent ones, and many more have been covered up by our corrupt leaders, the high priests of that terrible deity Diversity. Let us be honest, this is a regular occurrence in India, as is rape and sexual abuse in general, so to claim that it would be any different here would be either foolish or disingenuous. And yes, before you say it, we have our own rapists, which we have to prosecute because they are our own, but why would we import foreign ones to add to the problem?

 

You speak as though we never had a functioning society before you came, when it is patently the reverse. We built railroads for the trains that we invented, upon which you still travel. We built schools and hospitals and bridges and canals and airports, both in our country and yours. We improved your standard of living as well as ours. In spite of these improvements, you did not want us in your part of the world, and so we left. We tried to leave it in a better state than when we arrived. And yet, in spite of you not wanting us to be among your people, you have followed us back. 

 

Having followed us back, you have caused us no end of trouble. Be honest, it is not just one viral video of one fool, is it? Social media was flooded with Sikhs supporting not the victim’s family, but the perpetrator. You have also hidden behind a false narrative that only Muslims rape our children, but it is a racial and racist problem, not a religious one, which has come from the Subcontinent, the Middle East and Africa. The leader of the biggest child rape gang in the UK is a Sikh Indian, not a Muslim. Your crimes have been covered up by civnats for long enough, who were too afraid of accusations of racism to address the fact that it is a racial issue, while our own children have ironically been the victims of your racism.

 

No matter the decency of a guest, one never expects a guest to become a permanent fixture. The longer a guest stays, the greater the danger he overstays his welcome. Just as we overstayed our welcome in India, you have overstayed yours in Britain. Let us not forget that you are but guests here - or at least some, while others are squatters - and that you are no more a permanent fixture than we were in India. Joanna Lumley and Cliff Richard were obliged to move to Britain after decolonisation, despite their Indian birth. You increasingly rely on the corruption of our leadership, upon whom you impress your claims upon us through your lobbies, that you are as British as I. Are these the actions of people who have our best interests at heart?

 

Of course, I do not say that there are no intelligent Indians, nor that there are no decent ones. But the intelligent ones in Britain are often a greater threat to the British, as they head the pro-Indian anti-British lobby groups in my country. As for the decent ones, they are in India busy making India a better country for their fellow Indians. I suggest you all do likewise, for while there are capable Indians, there are many more running my country down. You know them, for they have done the same in India. It is why India is in its current state. I do not wish to see Britain become like that. You say we need you, which is to say you think we have no capable people of our own. This is your racism and your conceit, not mine. Neither do I wish for Britain to be a dumping ground for your surplus population any longer. I miss the greenness and the pleasantness of the England I remember of not so long ago, and furthermore, I shall get it back.

 

I hope therefore that I have indeed judged you on your actions and not on my assumptions. I have, after all, tried to give specific examples and appealed to historical fact and contemporary records. It is certainly not because your culture is “too old”. In any case, your culture was not even created by you, but by the ancient Aryan tribe who conquered you some four thousand years ago, but who were ultimately consumed by your teeming masses. I do not intend for my people to go the way of the Aryans.

 

Although I am one, I shall become many.

 

David Yorkshire