IS THE 250,000 FIGURE CITED BY RUPERT LOWE'S RAPE GANG ENQUIRY FALSE? Also, A Tribute to Marlene Guest
Since the publication of Rupert Lowe’s rape gang enquiry report the
other day, there has been much speculation as to where he obtained the
figure of 250,000 victims and if this number is realistic. This
questioning, particularly with the emphasis on an attempt to debunk this
figure and thereby dismiss the whole report as a fabrication, has
largely come from the extreme left and non-White men largely of Asian
and Muslim background. This ought to come as no surprise, as left wing
extremists and Muslim terrorists have now become strange bedfellows. Two
of the most vocal have been the current leader of the Green Party Zack
Polanski, a homosexual Jew, and former Scottish First Minister Humza
Yousaf, a Muslim anti-White racist who introduced laws to curtail the
free speech of indigenous Scots.
Before answering the question
that forms the title of this article, I would like to say a few words
regarding my own personal involvement in this matter. Between 2007 and
2011, I was an active member of the British National Party who
campaigned in South Yorkshire. Rotherham was one of the towns in which I
helped out. Indeed, the first person I met in the BNP was Marlene
Guest, who was the branch organiser for Rotherham and was elected
councillor for the Wingfield ward the following year. She had defected
from the Liberal Democrats for their failure to tackle the problems we
will discuss. We met at the top of the steps to Rotherham market,
opposite the Rotherham College of Arts and Technology, which had become a
haven for Pakistani youths given the grants for further and higher
education that had been taken away from the indigenous working class a
decade earlier by Tony Blair.
We
had spoken on the phone prior to our meeting, and Marlene came
prepared: she brought with her a dossier on the information she had
collated about the Asian rape gangs in Rotherham. This came as a shock
to me. A Yorkshireman myself who had worked in Rotherham for a year but a
few years prior and who had sometimes drunk at weekends in the local
bars, I was oblivious to any of this. Indeed, I initially doubted the
veracity of Marlene’s claims; the reports seemed just too extreme and
egregious, like something out of a badly written pulp horror novel by
James Herbert and the like. But as she took me through the evidence over
several weeks, and as others shared their accounts at the stall, it was
clear that this was the reality for many young White girls in
Rotherham.
What was difficult to believe most initially was the
conspiracy of those in positions of power: the police, NHS doctors and
nurses, the local councillors, the MP Denis MacShane (I will name and
shame the career criminal who was finally convicted for fraud), members
of the Labour, LibDem and Conservative Parties, the media journalists
both local and national, social workers, school teachers, they all
conspired to aid the rape gangs sacrifice our children, all in the name
of their god Diversity. In the case of the police and social services,
it is finally coming to light that they did not just aid and abet the
rapists, but were often in on the rape itself. When I told people this,
they could not believe it. This was probably why we failed most: the
unbelievability of it all. And the media was only too happy to report
this narrative: it was unbelievable because it was untrue, and we were
liars.
For a long time after the collapse of the BNP at the hands
of Nick Griffin and his cronies, I suffered with depression; our failure
haunted me and I became mentally very ill. It still bothers me to this
day. Marlene asked me to stand as a candidate in the 2010 general
election, and I accepted, but stood down after an attempt by the BNP
Yorkshire organiser to con me out of £1700. I was also working abroad at
the time, and was not able to attend the stalls in Rotherham and
Barnsley as often as I would have liked, but even so, I have often felt I
should have done more when I was home, in spite of the pressure put on
me by family and friends. Indeed, my activism with the BNP alienated me
from many friends and from my then-girlfriend. Marlene herself was also
under constant pressure to leave it to others by her nearest and
dearest. She did not. Never was a woman more steadfast, dogged and
righteous in her cause. Not one feminist turned up to defend the abused,
but Marlene was always there, a constant thorn in the sides of those
who would cover up this national disgrace.
Such a thorn was she
that when she died of cancer at the end of 2014, the former deputy
leader of Rotherham council Jahangir Akhtar, a Pakistani man who has
never been brought to trial despite rape allegations against him and the
fact that his relatives actually ran the biggest paedophile and rape
ring in Rotherham, wrote: “Heard Marlene Guest has died. Will only say
two words "Ding Dong".” This is a reference, of course, to the song
“Ding Dong, the Witch is Dead” from The Wizard of Oz. If Marlene was a
witch, she was Glinda, the good witch of the south, in this case of
South Yorkshire.
When Marlene was elected onto the council in
2008, Akhtar and the others conspired to keep Marlene out of council
meetings by neglecting to tell her when and where the meetings were
being held, and by omitting her from e-mail circulars regarding council
business in general. “This is democracy manifest!” as Jack Karlson would
say. Things like the reports she created would go missing. It was not
the only things that went missing. In one particular instance I remember
all too well, a twelve-year-old girl had been impregnated by a member
of the Asian network. The aborted foetus was held as DNA evidence of
paternity by Rotherham police. Marlene, chasing up the case, repeatedly
asked them why the man had not been prosecuted despite having caste-iron
proof of rape. Eventually, the police reported to her that the foetus
had been “lost”. That is not police negligence, that is police
corruption and criminality. That is perverting the course of justice.
As
is finally coming to light, many police officers were not just in on
the cover up, nor party to the arrest of men who tried to rescue
victims, but also were active participants in the rape itself. And thus
when leftists hold up such statistics as the ones below as “proof” of
the mass rape of young White girls not being ethnic in origin, well
there are lies, damn lies and statistics, as they say. When the police
refuse to prosecute certain groups for rape, as has happened en masse,
you can throw those statistics in the bin. And this was the difficulty
we had in getting justice, because the custodians of justice were (and
are) criminals. I once asked Marlene Guest point blank what more could
be done. She was at a loss. “Nothing more can be done,” she said. It
would have taken a militia to stop the rape in Rotherham, and few even
believed it was happening, or didn’t want to believe.
And so we come to the question of the 250,000 victims. In 2014, an
official report by Alexis Jay suggested that some 1400 girls had
suffered rape and sexual assault between 1997 and 2013. This then does
not take into account the reports from the early to mid-1990s, when the
convicted rapist “Lord” Ahmed was head of the council, nor obviously the
thirteen years hence. I think we can therefore safely double that,
particularly as many girls had not come forward and were still being
exploited, just as they are still being now. 2800 is a conservative
estimate, and this in a town of roughly 120,000. The figure seems high
until one factors in the time frame and the fact that many victims no
longer live there.
Places like Oldham, Huddersfield and Rochdale
are comparable, while Keighley, Batley and Dewsbury are smaller, but are
still areas of high sexual criminality. Now imagine cities the size of
Bradford and Leeds, where rape gangs have been rife. For more details on
Bradford the former BNP councillor Dr James Lewthwaite is good to
listen to. We are not even out of the north yet. And this rather answers
the question; I do not think 250,000 is realistic. I think it might be
realistic just for the north of England, but when one factors in the
scandals of Oxford and Telford, and the cities of Leicester, Nottingham
and particularly Birmingham, I think one must surely at least double
that figure. And we haven’t even mentioned London.
Rupert Lowe MP
has said that he intends to begin prosecuting the government and civil
service officials involved in the cover-up. That is a good start. I wish
him luck in that. I doubt he will ever wish to involve anyone as
radical as me in this endeavour, but should he want my help in any way I
am able, I offer it freely and will not mention it to anyone. Perhaps
he might use his position as an MP to ask a question in the House of
Commons: why has “Lord” Ahmed of Rotherham’s life peerage not been
rescinded? Why indeed was his already lenient sentence for serious
sexual assault and attempted rape reduced on appeal? Does he have some
kind of hold over politicians in the Labour Party and beyond? After all,
we know that the sex trafficker and child molester Jeffrey Epstein had
infiltrated the Labour Party via his fellow Jew Peter Mandelson. We also
know, from the work of the MP Geoffrey Dickens, who compiled a now
“missing” dossier on the subject, that paedophilia and child abuse was
rife among the political and judicial class.
I would also ask
something of him: I would ask that he give an honorable mention to
Marlene Guest, for there are many who, since her death, have taken the
credit for her hard work. We all know who they are, and they have
enriched themselves in doing so. I was gratified to see a positive
response to a tweet I posted the other day. It would be nice if she
gained further recognition.
No comments:
Post a Comment