Sunday, 19 March 2017


Feminist novelist Naomi Alderman has been put on the longlist for this year's Orwell Book Prize for political writing, with her work of fiction The Power. I have not read the book and have no intention of doing so. The synopsis from the book's inside cover says it all:


'She throws her head back and pushes her chest forward and lets go a huge blast right into the centre of his body. The rivulets and streams of red scarring run across his chest and up around his throat. She'd put her hand on his heart and stopped him dead.'

Suddenly - tomorrow or the day after - girls find that with a flick of their fingers, they can inflict agonizing pain and even death. With this single twist, the four lives at the heart of Naomi Alderman's extraordinary, visceral novel are utterly transformed, and we look at the world in an entirely new light.

What if the power to hurt were in women's hands?


It would be very easy to stereotype Mizz Alderman as a morbidly obese, ugly and unpopular woman writing out her masturbatory fantasies as a revenge against all those men who found her clumsy advances disgusting during her teenage years. It would be very easy because it is true. It is not the whole truth though. As you may have noticed from the necklace she is wearing in the photo above, Mizz Alderman is Jewish.


Yet again, we see Jews at the forefront in creating a 'battle of the sexes' in the West. Morgoth Penguin has written a good article on how Jews manipulate discourse with regard even to our right to exist as a race. Here we have Mizz Alderman manipulating discourse to create hatred between White Gentiles on sexual lines, like many of her predecessors: Susan Sontag, Mike Nichols, Philip Rieff, Herbert Marcuse, for example, were prominent members of one among many Jewish cultural cabals in the 1950s aiming at creating sexual friction in white society. One notes that many were male. Why is this? It is because they were not targetting their own society.


Mizz Alderman states that the book explores women having all the power in society as a role reversal, as though men have all the power now, which is an outright lie. Her novel is itself proof of the lie. If men controlled society to the degree she claims, how would this book ever come to be published? There has, to an extent, been a historical marginalisation of women among the middle classes, but to not nearly to the degree the feminists claim, and one notes women had a healthy status in the upper and working classes, and one might consider that the previous marginalisation of bourgeois women in public life began with the acceptance of Jewish thought in Europe during Christianisation. One notes that the middle class have always been the most Judaised class and served as enablers to the Jews in our society as they sought to take power from the aristocracy.


The roots and purpose of feminism are well-known. What is more problematic is the acceptance within the Alt Right of the other side of this coin: the Manosphere. It was inevitable that a reaction against feminism would appear in mainstream society and that reaction would be co-opted. The Manosphere is more problematic than feminism simply because of its ready acceptance within the Alt Right. Imagine for a moment that feminism were accepted in the Alt Right. Would any proud men worth their salt be a part of the movement? Then equally, how can a proud white woman be expected to join a movement in which she is treated like a lump of meat?


And again, we have people who look vaguely White, but who are not, taking up leading positions in turning one sex against the other. Daryush Valizadeh, otherwise known as Roosh V, runs the Return of Kings website. I do not have to waste time on Valizadeh himself, as Greg Johnson has pretty much covered everything on Counter Currents. Basically, he is another non-White who plays with the idea of being “a bit rapey” with white women. In his attack on the Alt Right wishing to control sexuality, he compared it to the hated feminism. The article he wrote was conspicuous by what it left out: that Islam also controls sexuality. Islam appears to be above criticism though, and one is left to speculate as to why. One notes he has never written a book entitled Bang Iran or Bang Armenia. Perhaps that would be a bit too close to home. His antics remind Whites all too keenly of Rotherham and Cologne. Let us be frank: Roosh has very Arabic features and does not identify as White nor is interested in white survival:


 'Beyond considering the scientific basis for some race generalizations, “race realism” stops for me. Race concerns me very little in the lifestyle that I believe is optimal for the individual man when it comes to improving his love life, well being, and overall happiness. The advice I teach is race blind, and this is shown by the diverse grouping of men from around the world who has been helped by it.'



The godfather to them all is undoubtably Ross Jeffries, the Jewish author of How to Get the Women You Desire into Bed. Inevitably, given the ethnic nature of media control, he has been featured on many TV programmes. For some, it must be tempting to follow the advice of these self-proclaimed sages who assert that they hold the key to unlocking women's hearts. They do not. They unlock the legs of a certain type of woman and that is all, for, in spite of (((Hollywood))) propaganda to the contrary, such women have no hearts. And this kind of woman is as useful to a functional society as a man who believes himself successful in life if he can get this sort of woman into bed. How can a society function, whose members' highest goals revolve around individualist self-gratification? How can a people remain a people if its heroes are from other races and promoting destructive behaviour?


What I am saying is this: if the Alt Right is to be a force for the saviour of Whites worldwide, it must be selective about inclusion - just as our societies should have been selective about inclusion hundreds of years ago. It must also promote unity between the sexes and classes as much as exclusion towards non-Whites and their shills. Those promoting division between man and woman must be made to realise their mistake. If they do not accept their error of judgement, they must be cast aside, for a bad apple will always rot the whole barrel. Some see our present age in purely negative terms, that all around is corrupted and ruined. Yet this cultural wasteland also brings with it the opportunity to create something new and good from the lessons of the old. Let us learn from our history, that we might not make the same mistakes.

1 comment:

  1. I agree with most of what you say, but believing in traditional gender roles, as the vast majority of the Alt Right do, hardly equates to treating women like a lump of meat and has no connection whatsoever to the sort of semitic rapeyness espoused by the likes of Roosh. We probably despise him and his kind more than the feminists do.