#NOTALLMUSLIMS #NOTALLJEWS #NOTALLBLACKS

This is going to be a brief article, as I wish just to address a single point of sophistry that has been repeated in the mainstream media so often that it even seems to be infecting the more easily beguiled on the Right - even on the Alt Right. This is the idea that 'not all Muslims are terrorists'. Some on the Right have taken this further and added that 'not all Blacks commit crime' and 'not all Jews wish to destroy White Culture'. 

 

 

 

First of all, let us admit that this is true, because it is. To say that all Muslims, Jews and Blacks are inherently wicked people who think of nothing but our destruction would be rather foolish and easily disproven by our enemies, who would make us look like imbeciles. Yet, as Rightists ought to know, all people do not count. The mass of all peoples do precisely what their elites tell them to do. This is not a critique of the mass, because every society needs a mass to function. An organic society is pyramidal, with the level of responsibility rising ever further up the pyramid and conformity increasing in the reverse direction. It has to be so, otherwise, as even a liberal like Aldous Huxley came to realise, society cannot function. One cannot have a society of autonomous decision-makers, because everyone would be pulling in their various directions of what they probably thought was beneficial for society as a whole, but perhaps also for themselves, until one had no society at all. This is the reason a hierarchical system of some sort is always needed.

 

 

In Islamic societies, that hierarchy is based upon both tribal rulers and religious leaders, largely the latter outside of Arabia. The designation Sheikh, for example, can mean either the one or the other. Blacks have always been tribal and led by warrior chieftains. In modern times, these are now the warlords in Africa and the gang leaders in the Occidental world. Jews are more complex, because for centuries, they formed both separate societies within foreign societies and yet interacted with and constituted part of those alien societies. For Orthodox Jews, the leadership is the rabbinical system of religious scholars, whereas with secular Jews, this is replaced by financial, academic, media and business elites. The job of any elite is to look after the interests of his own group, which can come at the expense of other groups. This group can be racial, religious or more usually a mixture of both. In a truly organic society, the race and the religion are one, as in the various forms of European Paganism and Judaism.

 

 

 

The problem in the Occidental world is that our organic aristocratic elites have been replaced by people who belong further down the pyramid: the caste of financiers, merchants, academics, media heads and bureaucrats, who have no idea how an organic society functions, nor are really interested in such things. One notices that these correlate to the secular Jewish elites. There is a difference here though, in that the Jews having been part of our societies, they have had to act as a group to keep their identity. However, as I have mentioned elsewhere, they also have a habit of deconstructing other groups with which they come into contact to further the supremacy of their own group. This is quite normal, as it is part of Nature to secure the success of one's own ethnic group, and different ethnic groups, in being different, have different methods of facilitating this. This Jewish bourgeois elite, then, is a genuine elite, whereas the White Gentile bourgeoisie is a middle class that is artificially at the top of the pyramid where the upper class should be.

 

 

One notices too that now the Jews have their own ethnostate in Israel, the true elite is again rabbinical, with politicians (who are in any case merely the administrators for the real elites) bowing to the authority of the religious leaders. The Jewish leaders of business, media, finance etc. being a genuine elite, as opposed to that of the White Gentile bourgoisie, has meant that it has been easy for the Jews to dominate the Gentiles and manipulate the structures of society, especially as that society is Christian - a universalist doctrine with a Jew as the ideal man at its head. The Gentile middle class, in being both Christian and middle class, have therefore been only too willing to defer to the authority of the Jew, even when Jewish academics deconstructed Christianity itself. To the bourgeois White Gentile, the Jewish elite preaches cosmopolitanism, globalism and multiculturalism, while rarely practicing it itself in its homeland. 

 

 

 

That said, intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles has occurred, for there are Jews who genuinely think in the same cosmopolitan terms as the White Gentile bourgeoisie and are equally bourgeois. There has also been marriage arrangements conducted in the same way as the Spanish would marry Native Central Americans, their descendants then ruling over the natives on behalf of the Spanish. Witness what is happening with the Trump family. The Spanish later introduced a policy of Mestizisation to destroy the Indian cultures and populations once and for all and make rebellions against Spanish rule, like the Pueblo Revolt of 1680 under Popé, impossible. It is no coincidence that this very same policy of miscegenation, though advocated for Europeans with Negroes and Asians, appears in the miscegenated philo-Semite Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi's Praktischer Idealismus, the blueprint for the European Union. 

 

 

Now, you will notice here that I have been speaking of the elites, but what of their relation to the masses? The relationship is quite simple: the masses largely do what they are told. That said, the White European masses seem most conditioned to servility and passivity and this is again a product of the meekness and passivity inherent in Christianity, which has shaped our cultures for centuries. However, other peoples are not being indoctrinated into servility and passivity. The Arabs and Arabised peoples under Islam have a text called the Qur'an that encourages aggression against 'the infidels'. Make no mistake: the Qur'an is a permission slip from the elite that gives licence to the footsoldiers, that makes their mission of rape and murder divine. 

 

 

 

Equally, the Talmud is explicitly anti-Christian i.e. anti-non-Jew. Black leaders, having never produced a written culture, tend to do things orally, and in any case, often defer to Jewish or Arabic power, which is currently aimed against European Man. Read the history of the NAACP or look into who is financing Black Lives Matter and you will find the names of those elites echo down the hallway. Among the masses, there are those who are actively hostile towards White Europeans and those who are not in their more passive nature. Yet how many speak out about what is happening in European homelands? And why would they when they know their own groups stand to gain at our expense? That is the harsh reality of Nature and is instinctive. Christianity, though, serves to dull those instincts.

 

 

So yes, 'not all' is correct, but not all have relevance. And a 'good Jew' who blew the whistle on the Podesta Brothers like Seth Rich cannot be used to form a general rule because he is an exception to that rule, and therefore cannot be used as exemplar. As long as these alien peoples are among us, a certain percentage, a vanguard, will always emerge from them who are hostile, just as there are those who merely walk on by after every terrorist attrocity and not give a damn. Sadly, those who do not give a damn include the sophists of our own fake elite.