LEWISHAM EAST BYE-ELECTION AND HOW MOVEMENTS DIE

The results for the Lewisham East bye-election came in yesterday, with Labour winning by a comfortable majority. Both the Labour Party and British law showed its anti-White bias, as Labour excluded Whites from the shortlist of candidates, the winner Janet Daby being the daughter of West Indian Windrush immigrants, her candidacy obviously motivated by the current Windrush fervour in Westminster regardless of ability. The British National Party, which we will come onto in due course, once excluded non-Whites from its membership until the government-financed QUANGO and ironically-named Equality and Human Rights Commission threatened court action under the Race Relations Act 1976. The Equality Act 2010, noted for its Orwellian doublethink, superceded this and allows for the anti-White discrimination practiced by the three main parties. UKIP came in sixth with a paltry 380 votes and the newly-formed and much-vaunted For Britain Party obtained a risible 266 votes. It is the latter's performance and its leader with which we are concerned here.

 

 

The Three Zionist Stooges: Anne Marie Waters, Tommy Robinson & Paul Weston

 

On what the mainstream media terms 'the far Right' Anne Marie Waters has been built up as some kind of savour of nationalist politics. I have said time and again that this is sheer buffoonery and have been called ignorant, stupid and a dinosaur by people who think themselves clever in the political arena. No, they said, we have to be pragmatic, to concentrate on one enemy at a time, to court other ethnic groups, to build bridges with the LGBT and Zionist lobbies and so on. I was not with the times, a relic; I did not understand that time has moved on and that we need a modern 'nationalist' politics for the contemporary era. The thing is that I have been hearing this song for many many years, and every time I hear it played, the nationalist movement dies. It is like listening to a funeral march. The results don't lie: 266 votes is insignificant and all that has happened is the equally insignificant UKIP vote has been split.

 

 

I will put a question out there: why vote for Anne Marie Waters when I can vote for UKIP? Neither is a nationalist party, both are opposed to mass immigration and both address the Muslim question, with UKIP party leader Gerard Batten speaking out about it quite regularly. Both are philo-Semitic (For Britain more so) and unconcerned with the issue of White genocide that is being perpetrated by the major parties and Jewish-supremacist lobbies. For Britain, we are told, are civic nationalists, but what does that mean? 'Civic' comes from 'civitas', the citizenry united by law, whereas 'nationalism' comes from 'natio' and is a politics defined by birth, tribe and race. The term is an oxymoron used by dishonest wannabe-politicos to bamboozle people on the Right. Nationalism is about WHO WE ARE and not what laws a multiracial rabble abides by. And what laws do For Britain want us to abide by? Are they not the same hard Leftist policies that has seen Waters, a former Labour Party and LGBT activist, tirelessly campaign for homosexual marriage and adoption? What does it profit us to get rid of Islam only to lose ourselves?

 

I remember back in the Nick Griffin era of the British National Party, a few years after he had stabbed his old mentor John Tyndall in the back and become elected as party chairman, word filtered down to the rank and file that we were no longer to mention Jewish involvement in lobbying for mass immigration and creating legislation that prevented people from speaking out about it or doing anything against it. Nor were we to mention their stranglehold on the global banking system that underpinned their political might. Israel was to be our brother in a war against Islamic expansionism and any talk of Jewish involvement in creating the conditions for that expansionism was strictly verboten. Equally, we were to concentrate on the Islamic jihad as the sole source of our ills as the BNP slowly made the transition into a multi-ethnic party, with ethnic minorities 'of the right type' being cosied up to long before the EHRC case in 2009. 

 

 

 

I am ashamed to say that I went along with some of it and ended up writing propaganda for the BNP and a then-popular, now-long-defunct website called 'The Green Arrow' run by a Griffinite called Paul Morris and whose webmaster was married to a Japanese woman. Just to show how popular that website was, its Alexa rating was in the top 100,000 in the world and was on a par with the likes of Counter Currents, but was really just for British nationalists. Writing about black men with white women was fair game, but white men with yellow women was apparently just cosy, a pattern that has been repeated on the Alt Right, and I eventually withdrew my support after we were told to support the Zionist Britain First. Morris threw a hissy fit and all my articles were deleted. I was also one of the few who was against the clause being added to the BNP constitution that specifically welcomed 'ethnic minorities' into the party. Griffin had no need to put that in, but merely take the clause that excluded them out. He deliberately went over and above what was required, transforming the BNP into a multiracialist party. Jonathan Bowden's speech in which he called for the BNP to fight the case against the EHRC was bowdlerised for BNP TV in a beautiful piece of Orwellian revisionism. It is worth noting that the National Front has no clause whatsoever regarding the ethnicity of members, which therefore avoids any potential legal case against it while mainaining its commitment to indigenous Europeans.

 

 

It is true that many former Labour activists came into the party during those years, as Griffin 'modernised' the party. There would have been nothing wrong with that if they had 'seen the light' and become nationalists. Many former members try to tell me now that the BNP became 'a broad church' of people who could loosely be called nationalists and that that was the source of its strength, but that is not so. Diversity is never strength. What happened was that the old guard and 'hard-liners' who had built the party were slowly proscribed as the more 'moderate' voices came in. It was also during this time that financial impropriety became rife. I was due to stand in the 2010 General Election until Chris Beverley informed me that I would be charged £2000 for leafleting! Marlene Guest told me that the real cost was just £300. I told them I would conduct my own campaign and was duly passed over, leaving another seat uncontested. We were also to pay for our own election deposits, which was £500 and which would be refunded upon attaining 5% of the constituency vote, as is customary in a general election, but why could the party not afford it? What had happened to all the donation money and membership fees?

 

 

I see the same patterns repeating themselves now. Ex-BNP councillors like Susan Clapp and Frank Forte follow me around the internet hurling abuse and libelling me. They insinuate that because I do not support Zionist groups like For Britain, the EDL and Britain First that I am pro-Islam, when nothing could be further from the truth. As I have said many times, I am against all foreign powers having influence in the Occident. They demand my real name. To whom do they want to give it and why? They and others say that if we do not mention race and align ourselves with the Zionist cause, we will win elections. And there it is: the reality, 266 votes. And all this is in spite of the Zionist 'alternative media' spin and the publicity stunt by Tommy Robinson and his army of blind followers just before the election. All this is in spite of not mentioning race or the JQ. They tell people not to criticise the likes of Waters, Robinson, Paul Weston, Pat Condell et al because they wake people up. Nothing could be further from the truth. They sell people the Jewish dream. They try to make sure people never get to our position, because if we cannot criticise the Zionist fake Right, how are people ever meant to learn the truth about who has been promoting non-White immigration all these years? They criticise real nationalists as 'Nazis' and 'dinosaurs', yet we should not criticise them; how is that meant to work?

 

 

I also see the same obsession with donation money, but one has to ask: what is it being spent on? With all the money that various groups calling themselves nationalist have had donated, we should have had a fully-fledged nationalist media by now. There should be magazines, art exhibitions and cultural fesivals that get nationalism into the marrow. There should be TV and radio channels that promote our musicians and entertainers. Everyone whines about Youtube banning dissent, yet why do we not have our own version of Youtube? So much money has been squandered or misappropriated. Even now a fund has been set up for Tommy Robinson. Has a fund been set up for the victims of third-world rape gangs? Has money been spent on protecting our vulnerable young girls in areas of high third-world immigration? And remember, it is not just Muslims committing violence against our people, but hush! don't mention the subject of race! As far as I'm concerned, there is only one political party that has held true to the principle of nationalism and that is the National Front. There are also still good people in UKIP. For Britain is there to cut into the UKIP vote and led by a militant lesbian who failed to win the UKIP leadership election. Neither UKIP as a party nor For Britain will address the question of race, but the NF will. To quote an old Who song, I won't get fooled again, and neither should you.