A LETTER TO THE NATIONAL VANGUARD WEBSITE AND A CRITIQUE OF NAZISM

It has been brought to my attention that you at "National Vanguard" have been posting my articles on your website. You have neither permission nor have even sought permission to do so. What is stranger is that my name as author of said articles does not even appear; instead, the name of whoever posted the article on your website is there next to the title, as though he alone is solely responsible for it. At the bottom, finally, is a link to my website from where it was lifted. What you are doing is nothing short of intellectual theft. In short, to use an old-fashioned verb you will be most familiar with, you are jewing me. That said, unlike "National Vanguard", I do not scapegoat the Jew for the decline of the White European; and again, my articles are being carefully selected, and in some cases bowdlerised through editorial comment, to create a false impression that I blame all our ills on people of Jewish extraction. Let me make myself clear, the fault for our present situation lies totally with corrupt White Europeans in positions of power, and has done throughout history. The Jews, speaking as a broad group rather than individuals, have taken advantage of their corruption, but they are not the only other ethnic group to do so. Certainly, the Arab and the Chinaman are also having great success in world domination as the White European is disenfranchised, because our own leadership in its corruption has surrended its authority to that of the Other.

 

 

Another reason I do not wish to be associated with "National Vanguard" is their Nazism. I have now almost totally dispensed with the term National Socialism because National Socialism as a political entity ended in 1945. What remains is cartoonish Jollywood-inspired buffoonery. Even then, people have often asked me why I hate historical National Socialism. My answers are quite simple:

1. I detest all police states, no matter by whom they are run.

2. A nation should never be shaped by political ideology as a basis for its identity.

3. I believe in the accountability of leaders.

4. I believe the Czechs had a right to their own homeland governed by themselves. The same goes for the Poles etc.

5. I have never bought into the mythical Hitler bullshit. Napoleon made egregious mistakes. To copy them takes a special kind of nutcase.

6. The National Socialists did not just attack Communists. They killed supposedly fellow Rightists and each other. Good examples are the Night of the Long Knives, the July Putsch and the murder of Engelbert Dolfuß.

7. The National Socialists defamed, libelled and character assassinated any high-profile figure they happened to dislike, rather like the Communists. Erich Maria Remarque and Otto Dix, who had both bravely fought for Germany during WWI, are good examples.

8. Culturally, National Socialism is just one step above Communism. The regime stunted creativity with its rigid control of content and aesthetics and no great artists were created during this period.

9. I despise any attempt at the creation of a uniform, standardised slave to the state. The National Socialists were as guilty of this at the national level as much as the present elites are at the global level.

10. Hitler was absolutely to blame for WWII. Ludwig Beck realised it the moment the Wehrmacht invaded Czechoslovakia. One does not propagate a militaristic culture without having war in mind.

11. Truth matters. That is one of the great Rightist principles. It does not conform to political ideology. "Truth", as in all highly political regimes, changed as and when it suited the party.

As the proper Rightist thinker Viscount Lymington wrote about Germany and Italy in 1938, "There may be many reasons why we dislike the internal governments of these two states, but they are not the Communist reasons." Indeed, Nazis tend to like to keep the discourse sandwiched between Nazism and Communism, as though there are no other alternatives, and especially not better ones than Nazism nor worse ones than Communism. It's either National Socialism or international socialism and that's your lot, heaven or hell as the Judeo-Christians would have it. Nazis, neo-Nazis, National Bolsheviks or call them whatever you will are worse than the National Socialists of old. I can divide them into six groups:

1. Failures in life who idly dream of power.

2. Homosexual males. One of the reasons there is such a disparity between the number of male and female Nazis is the cult draws a lot of bummers who want to keep it a sausage fest. Homosexuals are sexual nihilists and are sexually attracted to that which will destroy them, hence the Counter Currents crowd etc.

3. Unfortunate people (usually young males) who have been brainwashed into the Nazi cult by older men belonging to the groups below. In some cases, though, they will never escape the ring of ideology.

4. Ideological obsessives. Akin to Communists and Christian fundamentalists, they will have absorbed and be able to quote all the nonsense by the holy saints of neo-Nazism David Irving, Savitri Devi, Miguel Serrano etc. If ever one brings up inconvenient facts of history, there will always be some excuse to ensure Hitler's sainthood, and of course, "True National Socialism has never been tried"....

5. Amoral leeches who lead a parasitic lifestyle off the backs of their followers. Then they have the cheek to "name the Jew"....

6. People working for our enemies (Antifa, government agencies, Jewish supremacists etc.) who wish to create the enemy they want the public to see.

 

Let me be clear: I pity the third type and to an extent the first, depending on circumstances. Many young working-class White Europeans are set up to fail by the present global elites and are therefore prey to those who would take advantage of them. Drug dealers, who offer them temporary nepenthe from their wretched realities, certainly do. Equally, there are those who offer them ideological drugs and false hope by feeding them lies about how to win our battle, lies that may well lead them to prison cells on trumped-up charges of "terrorism", as has already happened in Britain. Then there is the fact that these leaders do not even believe in the preservation of their race in the first place. They hide behind nonsense like "the race of the spirit" and "honorary Aryan", and may even quote a bit of Julius Evola (despite Evola's critique of National Socialism), again as though politics trumps science and as though the soul does not go hand-in-glove with biology.

This brings me back to "National Vanguard". It was they who were, like the rest of the Aut Right, only too willing to include a Heinz 57 like Tara McCarthy: part Indian, part Jew, part White European, part fuck-knows-what-else. It came as no surprise to me when the "ex"-feminist, "ex"-anti-natalist, "ex"-SJW caused such discord within the wider "movement". Yet "National Vanguard" continued to support her. Just what nation are they the vanguard of exactly, the last-man mulatto manufactured nation of the globalist elites? Equally, many involved with "National Vanguard" at the highest level have been proven to be persons of extremely low character. I do not wish to list them, but a bit of research reveals all sorts of unsavoury stuff. They are not people I wish to be associated with, but they obviously seem to wish to be associated with me, or perhaps create the impression that I am associated with them. Therefore, I wish it to be known that I do not and have never written for "National Vanguard" and want nothing to do with "National Vanguard". Please remove my articles from your website.